Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Its All About Me

Time for another biased post on Barack Obama...

I couldn't resist posting something about Obama's speech on Tuesday addressing the issue of race in America. You can watch the entire speech by clicking here.

The speech itself, and this great DailyKos analysis piece, got me thinking about some of the reasons why Obama's words seem to have more gravity those of both recent and current presidential contenders.

In the Kos post linked above, Kos describes how Bill Clinton was heralded as savior of the Democratic party for forging the centrist "Third Way" in the 90's. Kos also points out that the Clintons were ultimately poisonous for the party, enabling Rebublican domination of Congressional elections from '94 to '06, not to mention consecutive presidential losses for Democrats in '00 and '04.

I think some Democrats have lingering reservations about the Clintons because, as this campaign has surely showed at various points, the Clintons always seem to be talking about themselves. What I want to explore here is how Obama is somehow able to make his politics very much about everyone else and all about himself at the same time. His recent speech on race is a perfect example. The speech was intensely personal, drawing on his life experiences from being raised by a sometimes-prejudiced white grandmother to attending church in the imperfect and diverse African-American community of Chicago. Yet at the same time as the viewer was drawn into his personal story, he honestly and accurately described the current status and implications of racial division in America, effectively making his remarks about the world in general.

I've seen politicians effectively connect their personal stories to contemporary issues, such as John Edwards this cycle and Bill Clinton in '92. But never have I seen someone with the skill and courage that Obama has shown to simultaneously broaden the discussion and inject so much of himself into such a volatile issue as race. Kudos.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

i'm all for rev. wright.. that dude knows his shit and isn't afraid to say it... all anti israel and our crazy government.. obama must agree with him on a lot more politics than he admits to, but yeah.

nick b

good work there chris...

Anonymous said...

A lot of political analysts attribute the 12 year Republican control of congress as a simple political cycle.

nick k.

Anonymous said...

that's an interesting way of looking at it. here's another: an articulate african-american with astounding public speaking skills giving a speech on a topic he can't be wrong about. i like those odds. and whadda ya know? everyone loves it. lets hope he sends some of those masterfully crafted lines hillary's way in the form of a polite request to clear the stage.

russ

Anonymous said...

and nick k is completely right. the only reason the gop held on to congress for longer during bush's term than the dems did during clinton's is because everyone rallied around bush after 9/11 and into the beginning of the war. to attribute the results of the elections in either '00 or '04 to clinton is unjust. not only did gore certifiably win in '00, but i don't think many would argue with the notion that bush took the cake in '04 as a result of high approval for the war (and maybe a little less-than-perfect campaigning on kerry's behalf). when was the last time a war time president perceived to be doing the right thing was voted out of office? remember, correlation does not imply causation.

beyond this, cnn is reporting that 18% of clinton supporters are saying they'd vote for mccain should obama win the primary. even more horrifying is that nearly 30% of obama supporters said they'd go for mccain if clinton wins. can we really say that a divided party under obama is better than one united headed by the she-man? at this point, i'd take joe leiberman.

russ

Sebastian T Brown said...

russ, you have it backwards. nearly 30% of Hillary´s backers would bail, only 18% of Obama´s would do the same.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/105691/McCain-vs-Obama-28-Clinton-Backers-McCain.aspx

Anonymous said...

that's still almost 1 in 5...a little much considering the petty differences between right? at least relative to mccain.

russ

Anonymous said...

in any case, i think those numbers are just an affirmation of the notion that far too much of the support both obama and clinton are receiving isn't based on their politics, but rather on the novelty of having a minority or she-man as pres

russ

Anonymous said...

glad you are back to writing...

kb